My annual thoughts ends here. Budgeting, and wider thoughts on intermittent fasting.
- PART 4
- Costings & Meals Prepping – is Keto/LCHF more resourcefully affordable?
- Sample Plan $25- $28
- Sample Plan $35-$45
- Resource Longevity Analysis
- Intermittent Fasting and sociology
- Wrapping it up.
- Costings & Meals Prepping – is Keto/LCHF more resourcefully affordable?
Is Cyclical Keto+IF more resourcefully affordable?
Having experienced sparse periods of HC+IF confirms a resounding yes. As stressed earlier in Part 3 -the need to accessorise each and every meal – with sauces, condiments, desserts to substantiate – quickly becomes an obsession for flavour. Yet doing no favour – on the wallet.
I’ve collected enough years of self-metabolic experiment to conclude that hunger management in Keto+IF is more manageable. Alas, it is very easy for an everyday Pedestrian to label me mistaken. Especially when looking at Longevity Analysis section below do not instantly make any “economic” sense to them. “Numbers” alone NEVER, I repeat – NEVER – TRANSLATE TO future metabolic sensations. Nor overall biological experiences.
Nevertheless, I impose no binary subscription to “nutrition”. If ketogenic intervention is not applicable to you, then HC+IF might be worthy to consider. Irrespective ketogenic or non ketogenic. You must find your own combination of principles that fits your contextual needs.
Sample plan – $25-$28.
To date, $25 – $28 are my absolute frugal limits. Below sample assumes that (very few) things still yet remains in the pantry, the fridge and the freezer.
- Eggs: $2 – $2.50
- 500g beef heart, livers or if I’m lucky – short dated chicken drumsticks : $3- $3.50
- 500ML EVOO: $4
- Standard 500g block cheddar: $4
- 1kg of carrots + short dated vegs : kale / turnips / pumpkins : $3
- Yoghurt 1kg: $3.50 – $4
- 3L full cream milk: $3
- 1kg Rice for refeeds: $1.4
- 500g pasta for refeeds: $65c
- 900g oats for refeeds: $1.2
- Lebanese Flat breads for refeeds: $0.90
Sample plan – $35-$45 (fit for a humble king)
As you can see and as previously stressed – $25-$30 per week for indefinite periods – are simply not sustainable. Because of the severely limited carbohydrate refeed opportunities. Worse – condiment privileges are far and few. Hence, these higher spending bracket once every two or three weeks serves an adequately replenishing purpose. Also allowing the weekly dessert whey cheesecakes during Keto/IF days.
- <MOST OF THE ABOVE $25-$28 plan> + few combination/s of below;
- Extra protein sources: burger patties / minces / whole chickens : $6.
- 500g no sugar added peanut butters: $3-$4.
- Various condiments: mayonnaise/s, mustards, minced garlic, extra herbs: $5.25
- Cream cheese: $2.50 – $2.75 for Keto/LC+IF whey desserts.
- 100g Gelatin powder: $3.5
- 4kg potatoes for refeeds: $3.5 (sadly unexplained price increase throughout the year)
- Rice based cereals for refeeds: $2.5
- 2Litre Low Fat Ice Creams for refeeds: $2
(Sample) Longevity Analysis.
Now then, how long do these supplies actually last?
- 12x 600/700g Eggs: 2.25 used per day (if also counted towards the making of whey cheesecake as dessert) on average amongst Keto+IF days. Up to 4.5 days of longevity per carton of 12.
- 500ml EVOO: 15ML to 20ML per day used = 29 serves average. Theoretically, up to 29 days of longevity.
- 250g cream cheese: 50% used per week’s batch of whey cheesecake (see recipe V2). Hence 2 weeks of longevity.
- Greek Yoghurt 1kg: from 250g (during Keto/LC+IF) for whey cheesecake + sporadic use / or whey gelatin dessert recipe, to 250g (each day during 2x refeed days) = approx 500g-600g per week. On average up to 12 days of longevity.
- Condiments (various).
- Mayonnaise: $2 250g pesto mayo (ALDI® Colway brand for example) =15-20g each per day. Up to 12 days of longevity.
- Mixed herbs: $1.60 for 25g. 3 grams each used per day. Up to 8 days of longevity.
- The cheese: variable longevity.
- For the expensive gouda = $4 for 200g at 40g each serve during Keto+IF = 5 serves, hence, 5 days of longevity.
- Or – For ordinary cheddar = $4.5 for 500g at 45g each serve during Keto+IF = 11 serves. Hence, 11 days of longevity.
- 3L Full cream milk: anywhere between 250ML to 300ml per day of use of Keto+IF (dilute with water + xanthan gum), and from 600 to 800ml used during each refeed day. = At best < a week. Sometimes there are days I have to only use no more than 200ml per day of Keto+IF.
- Variable meats –> variable longevity.
- Raw weight 500g beef mince typically yields 425g usable cooked amount. Servings wise – 50g on the low end (combined with other sources such as organ meats), or 100g on the high end. Hence, 5 usable serves across 5 days longevity on average.
- Entire chicken at $6 (best price I found was $3 though a rare find amongst Asian delis’) typically yields up to seven (7) usable serves cooked amount. Hence 7 days of longevity.
- 1kg of chicken drumsticks at $4 or if I’m lucky $3.50 for short dated – yields 4.5 cooked serves. About 4.5 days of longevity.
- 500g livers (either beef, lamb or chickens) – yields around 450g of usable cooked amount. 100g each serve, about 4.5 days of longevity. However due to its insanely high Vitamin A I eat it no more than three times per week,hence longevity may vary on up to 10 days of use.
- 500g of ox hearts – yields more or less the same usage and longevity as beef minces.
- Vegetables: various longevity.
- 1kg carrots: 50g to 75g serve (grated / processed with mini chopper) per day = 17 serves. Hence 17 days of longevity.
- 1 bundle of kale (short dated) between 400 to 500g. 100g (raw uncooked weight amount) as average use per day = 4 to 5 serves. Hence 4 to 5 days of longevity.
- 1 kilogram of pumpkins. Between 50 to 80g of (uncooked weight amount used) per day = 14 to 15 serves. Up to two weeks of longevity, if also turned into DIY pumpkin purees.
- 1 entire head of cauliflower (approx 1.5 kilogram). Between 100g to 150g (uncooked weight amount used) per day = ten serves. Up to ten days of longevity.
Carb sources during 48 hour or 2.5 day refeeds
- 1kg rice: 120g used (dry weight used) per day of refeed meal. Hence, for up to 8 days.
- 400g Rice based cereals: 160g (dry weight) per day used. Hence, up to only 2 days.
- Potatoes: up to a month and half.
- 900g Oats: 100g (dry weight) used per day. Up to 9 days.
- 500g pastas: 100g used (dry weight) per day of refeed meal. Hence up to 5 days.
- Lebanese breads: finished pretty much in two days.
- 2Litre Low fat ice creams / neapolitan flavour: 350ML used per day of refeed. Hence up to 5.7 days
There are other things I’d wish to elaborate. But it is not practical to fit them all into this one singular post.
Besides, I have much more important matters to discuss. Something we rarely hear inbetween realm/s of nutrition and sociology.
Intermittent Fasting – a solution to the World’s Problems?
Bear in mind that similarly to my thoughts on the Mouse Utopia experiment, this section are subject for writing revisions; due to its complexity and layered concerns.
Before you ask – no – I am not a Muslim. I am certainly brought up very conservatively. But now uninstitutionalised as one would never expect considering my ethnicity. What I implore is a question that begs to be reconciled amongst ourselves.
That is – “What if” Intermittent Fasting were an “open liberty”? Expected yet not enforced. Encouraged yet unimposed. Would society then be a different place?
I wholeheartedly think so.
Peter Joseph stated way back in 2011’s Moving Forward, one reason that keeps our current economics system going – is consumption. There is however one mirror image to this word “consumption” I cannot let go of in my head for however number of years. Somehow – the word “ownership” – remains somewhere or somehow, connected.
This led me to believe that by gaining ownership– one also gains a permit – to consume. “Ownership” today is glamourised quantitatively as amassing enough haven of goods. All for displaying purchasing power. Such pursuit resonates amongst a company’s EBITDA graphs. Stocks performance charts. Balance sheets, profits and loss statements. Or that of an entire country’s GDP.
But underneath these graphs and charts – represents real biological beings. Succumbing to these feel-good allures of “standards”. If “Growth” and “Progress” bear different “standards” to the eyes of a peasant, against that of a politician or a plutocrat…. Who then, do you think has a higher seat, display or fervour of power to dictate how or what growth and progress “means”?
Who then; should “own” the qualitative meaning of “consumption?”
My “answer”, be however utopianist it may seem – is that of our own capable and willing – nutritional selves.
All economic systems and means of distributions demand a harmonious “Order”. Qualified by quantified validations. After all, Governances and/or Institutions loves putting entire biological citizens as source of blame. For any “lack of progress”, “lack of growth”, “lack of GDP” or “lack of contributory output” back to the economy. “Growth” or “Economy” for what? New F16 fighter jets in place of cancer research funding?
All economic systems throughout history rely on collectivist ideologies to coerce, guide and display what is binarily right and wrong. Establishments and institutions stems from this very purpose.
What is correct “enough” for them then, should therefore be (in their interpretation) a display of Equality. For all the rest underneath the ladder. Can they truly condense biological chaos into binarily-ordered subservience? I think not.
Coercively also – “growth” both glamourises and perpetuates hedonism (watch 3:45 onwards). Hedonism necessitates even more desire to gain permission for more consumption. Advertising perpetuates this through an ironic contradiction. The more such a race is instilled upon individuals at accruing these haven of securities – increasingly also becomes susceptible at instilling themselves more in-securities.
“Materialism” – I’d still wager do nonetheless serve as means of a tangibly objective-reward. But their meaningfulness is biologically restrictive to just one (1) pragmatic use and/or context, at a time.
Do you justify the biological needs of multiple Lamborghinis parked in just one garage? For one space? For one driver? At any given time?
Likewise “investing” (a polite derivative for “owning”) a dozen homes where one can only sleep in one home, at a time. Or a dozen 50″ plasma display screens where you can only watch one at a time. Or ten mobile phones in your drawer all claiming to have the same “smartphone” functionality. Yet your hands can only biologically use them one – at a time.
Fasting – implores a state of being with one.
You may indeed be thrown from all directions as multiple contexts. But only you can address and dissolve yourself in one of them contexts, one (1) at a time. Within this biological state, an authentic self re-evaluation of needs versus wants. I shall elaborate in three points.
Intermittent Fasting – represents a biological, individual – agency of CONTROL – at interpreting what “enough” means.
Let us examine the concept of “control” throughout history. “Control” assumes ownership / coordination of mass nutritional, physiological and sociological – agencies, authorities and authenticities. All economic paradigms instil “Control”. No matter how “Social” or “violent”, at least in theory. Communism certainly works in theory. Capitalism works in theory. Hell, even Martial Law works in theory.
Damagingly however, “in theory” also assumes concreteness and finality. Thus expecting infinite, unchanged subscription of the same “correctness”.
Can any one of these “economic” systems truly dictate and contain all that of subjective and chaotic variables of “correctness”? Harmoniously? Without conflicts or differences? Across not just one (1) human being, but infinitely – all the next unborn’s in billions? I think not.
Everything bears individualised context. As I assert earlier – “peace” is contextual sufficiency. “Violence” is contextual insufficiency.
“Control” therefore, only in the best of my uneducated imploration – must rightfully be reserved to the individual citizen. The biology of the “self”. The question of who dictates and owns the meaning of consumption thus – should not be a democratic question. Nor a democratic decision. It is an individual question, with a capably self-pragmatic decision.
Fasting is a state of bravely abstaining the self away from all consumption altogether. Allowing us to reconcile what is democratic, versus what is individualistic. What is pragmatically realistic amidst what is idealistic.
Fasting – is the ultimate reminder of what is Authentically – present.
To remind what I wrote in my book– the word “Fasting” – is an interpretive symbiosis of how constructively you interpret – “Time”. Agency, authority and authenticity of all “meanings” – should rightfully then be decisively – an Individual decision. As accordingly to his or her’s interpretation – of “time”.
When you eat food to a full regularity, each and every single meal and day of your lifetime – you are currently enjoying in the secluded haven of security. You are in the realm of “wants”. Now, when you are not consuming anything – you are in the realm of “needs”. You will not understand much of this. Until you alone experience long enough periods of structural scarcities. Beyond consent.
When you are in the realm of “needs” it is almost guaranteed – you also already are in the state of resilience. It is a question of how far you can attest yourself in such a prolonged state. And it is arguably far more of a genuine reception of an achievement. Such that you can indeed survive against all condescends, barriers and turbulences. Just by chanelling all embedded resources within you at authentically meeting your objectivities.
Hence, there is no other way at reconciling this present state of resilience. Other – than fasting from consumption itself. An exhaustive meeting and questioning of both structural liabilities; through authentic biological abilities.
Intermittent Fasting implores and encourages – a worldly state of no coercions.
“Eating food” today – has become synonymous to tribal divisions of “either you are with us” or “against ALL of us”. I so wanted to scream out what Jacque Fresco (whom sadly passed away) said over and over again. “This shit’s got to go”.
Picture yourself a day of living – where by no “race”, or of “believers” or “non believers” aka. “Religion” – are all democratically expected civil criteria. Only you and your own qualitative objective criteria to pursue day to day, is all that matters.
Fasting – is a whollistic, biological state allowing you to do just that. Fulfilling meritocracies without diversions of competing coercions for “correctness”. From Lipid Hypothesis to the moral allures of Soylent Green. Or doctors’ undying insistence that “morning breakfast is the most important meal of the day”. All this is nothing but frivolous pursuit at maintaining Coercions Hierarchy. As if the thought of some sort of “grand prize” imaginable awaiting them, is to me – absurdly hilarious.
It is human nature that laws are meant to be broken. For the benefit of the nutritional self. Intermittent Fasting can and shall – be broken in many ways. By only you, without external coercions.
Wrapping it up.
This Annual food for thoughts for 2018 are as diverse as I could have ever written. Spanning across thoughts on psychology, fitness, physiology and sociology. I’ve long envisaged to form for my viewers – an in-refutable insight over what it is like to self-nurture under prolonged austerity. So far I have survived, even despite my lingering uncertainties yet to come.
My book and this “Project” are both nearing four years old of lonesome existence. They may yet raise a question amongst curious first time readers. “All this project, this blog, this article – sounds full of institutional resentments. Why should it exists?”
I purely wish to remind, and to dispel today’s pedestrian subscription of what Humility means. Certainly not based on “spiritual” codex. But of physiological, nutritional, molecular whollistical compartmentalisation of “being“. All from within. Hence, “This Is™” – what I implore – as the true meaning of Humility.
One way of exerting this lateral re-definition I feel is to add a social-economics layer of discussion. Frugality. Structural limitations. Both sorely remaining unaddressed amidst today’s overly glamourised “fitness” and “health” Survivorship Biases. Beyond scrutinising the CICO equationto death, over and over.
I am not a “saint” nor a messenger claiming I carry some panacea against all the World’s Problems. All I offer is simply is a contextual imploration, nutritionally. For amongst the damaged or confused out there – to solemnly reconcile what enough means. Through questioning both their liabilities and their own abilities at establishing self-resilience, privacy, and authenticity. All against today’s prevailingly institutionalised, Correctness Hierarchy.
Rain or shine – may Nutritional Humility be your nurturing path. Thank you, 2018.